Whether it's a Mayor, a Governor, or a President, their policies can only have so much of an impact on the economy. Thus, credit and/or blame is proportional to the amount of policies he/she has been able to pass and the intensity of those policies. Scott Walker has exacted numerous
legislative changes and they have been
radical in nature.
The
Journal Sentinel opines:
Wisconsin gained a few jobs last year — very few — and still trails the U.S. average for job growth, as it has for three years, nearly the entire term of Gov. Scott Walker.
So, it has to be Walker's fault, right?
Sorry, but A+B doesn't equal C — not in this case.
The state's economy is vastly more complicated than such a simplistic and politically expedient explanation.
Where was such reasoned caution when the
Journal Sentinel was campaigning for Scott Walker?
He was Wisconsin's savior with so many game-changing ideas. [For some reason, more deregulation and tax cuts were going to save us ... again.]
Now ... he's just one man and he can only do so much. So give him a break.
They then pull out the classic, "Well, they do it too" argument:
How do the political pundits on either side explain the fact that Wisconsin has consistently trailed the national average for a decade — during both Republican and Democratic administrations?
Too bad this claim is false.
Wisconsin's
rank among the states in year-over-year employment change was 18th in 2003, in 2013 it was 41st. As the report
Gauging Employment Growth In Wisconsin details:
As recently as 2010, and during four of the previous nine years (September 2002‐2010), Wisconsin’s employment growth rate exceeded the national figure.
The
Journal then philosophizes, "We've long believed that the real reason for the state's sluggish job growth has a lot to do with Wisconsin's economic mix."
But wasn't Scott Walker opening Wisconsin for business? If you campaign guaranteeing business and jobs, don't your policies have to take some of the blame when the economy actually performs worse than it otherwise was performing?
The
Journal closes, "We see no evidence that Walker's policies have made more than a marginal difference, for better or worse, for Wisconsin's economy."
So, the new governor turns down $800 million in Federal rail subsidies, he kills millions more by pushing Talgo (a train builder) out of Wisconsin, he guts collective bargaining, he cuts school funding, and he gives away millions more in tax breaks to his cronies. Yet, according to the
Journal, none of this has anything to do with the fact that Wisconsin is economically performing worse than nearly every other state?
The misinformation campaign of Wisconsin's largest newspaper continues.
For Further Reading:
Prosecutors: Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker Part Of 'Criminal Scheme'
Gov. Scott Walker’s Campaign Violations
